Skip to content
industry8 Nov 20264 min

Karnataka says petrol has up to 31% ethanol; oil companies say their own tests show 19-20%

Karnataka's government claims some petrol pumps sold fuel with 26-31% ethanol against the mandated 20%. IOCL, BPCL and HPCL dispute the testing method and want joint retesting.

By Auto Grid Editorial

India's three big state-run fuel retailers have publicly disputed a Karnataka government claim that some petrol pumps in the state are selling fuel with far more ethanol than the mandated blend — a disagreement that, if it isn't resolved by joint retesting, leaves an open question over fuel quality for every petrol car owner in the state.

What happened

Karnataka's Department of Food, Civil Supplies, Consumer Affairs and Legal Metrology issued a press release claiming that petrol sampled from certain retail outlets in October 2026 contained between 26% and 31% ethanol — well above the 20% ceiling under India's E20 programme, which blends ethanol into petrol nationwide. The state government estimated the financial impact on drivers at roughly ₹1.01 lakh crore a year, combining an estimated ₹62,000 crore in lost fuel mileage and ₹39,000 crore in additional vehicle repair costs.

Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL), Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) and Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL) — who between them supply the overwhelming majority of retail petrol in India — responded jointly, and the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas backed their position in a press release on 7 November 2026. Their core argument: Karnataka's claim isn't supported by testing done to the prescribed standard.

The companies' own quality-coordination exercise tested 893 petrol samples across 27 states and union territories — 330 from IOCL, 280 from BPCL and 283 from HPCL — using the water-extraction method prescribed under Annex C of IS 17021, the Bureau of Indian Standards specification for ethanol-blended petrol. Every sample, nationally, came back within the prescribed 19-21% range. The 56 Karnataka-specific samples among them averaged 19.3% ethanol, with a 19-20% range — essentially spot-on, not over the limit.

The OMCs raised several specific objections to Karnataka's methodology:

  • The October sampling exercise, unlike a September one, was conducted without any OMC representative present.
  • The companies say they weren't given the retention samples, outlet-wise details or full laboratory reports needed to check the state's findings independently, despite asking through the State Level Coordinator.
  • The certificates Karnataka cited used a third-party laboratory rather than one notified under the Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Control Order, 2005 — the law that actually governs how this kind of fuel-quality dispute should be adjudicated.
  • Those certificates reportedly describe the test only as "Ethanol % by Gas Chromatography," without specifying the exact ASTM method, the required 1:1 dilution with oxygenate-free petrol, or the reference material used to correct the result — all mandatory steps under IS 17021's amended (August 2025) procedure.
  • Most tellingly on the science: the Karnataka certificates reported sample densities of 0.742-0.749 g/cc. Ethanol is denser than petrol, so a genuinely higher ethanol content should push density up, not down — the OMCs' own E20-compliant samples run denser, at 0.752-0.760 g/cc. A sample simultaneously less dense and supposedly higher in ethanol is, on the face of it, contradictory.

The OMCs have asked Karnataka for the complete documentation and proposed joint sampling and retesting at an authorised lab, with representatives from both sides present, to settle the matter under the agreed procedure.

What it means for an Indian buyer

If you run a petrol car in Karnataka, this dispute doesn't give you anything to act on yet — it's an unresolved disagreement between a state department and three national oil companies about testing procedure, not a confirmed finding that your fuel is out of spec. The companies' own nationwide data, if accurate, says E20 fuel across the country, Karnataka included, is blending within the mandated range.

That said, it's a useful reminder that ethanol-blended petrol has real, non-zero effects even within spec: the Ministry's own figures, cited in this dispute, put the typical mileage impact of E20 at around 1-2% for vehicles properly calibrated for it, rising to 3-6% for some older or non-compliant vehicles. If your mileage has dropped more sharply than that, the more likely causes are everyday ones — tyre pressure, a stale air filter, aggressive city driving — rather than an ethanol anomaly specific to Karnataka. And as every major manufacturer selling in India has already confirmed separately, using E20 fuel does not void your warranty, whatever this specific pump-level dispute turns out to show.

The Auto Grid angle

Fuel-quality disputes like this one are a good prompt to think about what else is quietly working on a car beyond the engine bay: ethanol-blended fuel, hard water at automated washes, and Indian heat and UV exposure all chip away at a car's paint and trim over years of ownership in ways that are easy to miss day-to-day. None of that is something a fuel additive or a pump-level dispute changes — but it's exactly the kind of slow, cumulative wear that a paint protection film layer is designed to buffer against, regardless of which side of an ethanol argument turns out to be right.

What's next

Karnataka hadn't publicly responded to the OMCs' request for joint sampling and documentation as of 8 November 2026. We'll update this piece if the state agrees to retesting, or if either side releases further technical data.

Sources

FAQs

Questions on this story

Karnataka's Department of Food, Civil Supplies, Consumer Affairs and Legal Metrology said petrol sampled from certain retail outlets in the state in October 2026 contained 26-31% ethanol — well above the national E20 (20%) blending target — and estimated this could be costing the state's drivers around ₹62,000 crore a year in lost mileage plus ₹39,000 crore in extra repair costs, a combined ₹1.01 lakh crore claim.

IOCL, BPCL and HPCL jointly dispute the finding. They tested 893 of their own fuel samples across 27 states and union territories — including 56 from Karnataka specifically — under the prescribed IS 17021 standard and found ethanol content of 19-21% nationally, and 19-20% (averaging 19.3%) in Karnataka. They also flagged that Karnataka's October sampling happened without OMC representatives present, used a third-party lab rather than one notified under the Control Order, and didn't share retention samples or full lab reports for independent verification.

Not based on anything in this dispute. Every major manufacturer selling in India has already confirmed, separately, that E20 use doesn't void warranty — carmakers made this explicit industry-wide as E20 rolled out nationally. This dispute is about whether Karnataka's pumps are dispensing fuel within the 20% blend spec, not about whether E20 itself is safe for your car.

It could, over time, in a vehicle not calibrated for it — ethanol-rich fuel can affect fuel system seals, injectors and mileage in engines designed for lower ethanol content, which is exactly why the OMCs' own technical rebuttal argues the claimed density readings in Karnataka's certificates are inconsistent with ethanol that concentrated. The Ministry's position is that no such over-blending is actually happening based on verified testing; the matter is now a dispute over whose test method is correct, not a confirmed finding of out-of-spec fuel.

The OMCs have asked Karnataka to share its full sampling documentation, outlet-wise lab reports and testing procedure, and have proposed joint sampling and retesting at an authorised laboratory with both state and OMC representatives present. As of 8 November 2026, Karnataka hadn't publicly responded to that request.